Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[6pack\]\s+Clutch\s+Master\s+Cylinder\s+diameters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[6pack\]\s+Clutch\s+Master\s+Cylinder\s+diameters\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [6pack] Clutch Master Cylinder diameters (score: 1): Author: michael lunsford <mblunsfordsr@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 12:18:14 -0700 (PDT); I know this has been discussed before but when you learn something the hard way you feel like you should share your misery. Soooo. I bought a new clutch master cylinder for the 69 I recently purchase; /html/6pack/2008-05/msg00166.html (7,443 bytes)
2. Re: [6pack] Clutch Master Cylinder diameters (score: 1): Author: tr6taylor@webtv.net (Sally or Dick Taylor); Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 17:55:57 -0700; Mike--You discovered why Triumph changed from the .75 to the .70, that is pushing more fluid takes more pedal pressure to activate the clutch. One of the tradeoffs for using the smaller bore is that; /html/6pack/2008-05/msg00167.html (8,299 bytes)
3. Re: [6pack] Clutch Master Cylinder diameters (score: 1): Author: im sloane <im_sloane@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 12:54:08 +0000; Interesting thread, but I don't quite follow the specs. The clutch on my 69 has always been very stiff, which after 20+ years I really like. The clutch on my brother's 73 is almost (for lack of a bet; /html/6pack/2008-05/msg00169.html (8,451 bytes)
4. Re: [6pack] Clutch Master Cylinder diameters (score: 1): Author: Robert Lang <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 10:05:46 -0400 (EDT); The early TR6's had a .75 bore clutch MC. They were "heavy", meaning you need more leg power to push and hold the clutch. At some point (I can't recall when, but I'll guess at CC50000) the factory s; /html/6pack/2008-05/msg00170.html (8,916 bytes)
5. Re: [6pack] Clutch Master Cylinder diameters (score: 1): Author: "Navarrette, Vance" <vance.navarrette@intel.com>; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 08:40:13 -0700; Add to the clutch MC machinations the fact that there have been numerous substitutions and cross references for the pressure plate on the TR6. The early TR6 clutch used the Borg and Beck pressure pl; /html/6pack/2008-05/msg00172.html (9,843 bytes)
6. Re: [6pack] Clutch Master Cylinder diameters (score: 1): Author: tr6taylor@webtv.net (Sally or Dick Taylor); Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 12:46:10 -0700; Sloane--Yes, the '69 is supposed to be stiffer, due to the larger CMC bore. But not so much that driving a TR with the smaller bore.seems odd. If you haven't "looked at" the clutch fork pin lately I'; /html/6pack/2008-05/msg00178.html (9,009 bytes)
7. Re: [6pack] Clutch Master Cylinder diameters (score: 1): Author: Jim Franks <jimmble@roadrunner.com>; Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 07:52:27 -0400; In my experience the Sachs plate is comparable in 'feel' to a Laycock. I never ran one for many miles, or with a super strong engine to give a longterm opinion on whether it is 'da bomb, however. I'; /html/6pack/2008-05/msg00193.html (9,510 bytes)
8. [6pack] Clutch Master Cylinder diameters (score: 1): Author: michael lunsford <mblunsfordsr@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 11:42:18 -0700 (PDT); I recently bought new clutch MCs for my 69 and 70 TR6. The 69 called for the .75 diameter bore and the 70 called for the .70 diameter. You can probably tell where I'm going from here already. There w; /html/6pack/2008-08/msg00128.html (7,732 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]