Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[6pack\]\s+Canada\s+\-\s+TR5\s+or\s+TR250\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[6pack\]\s+Canada\s+\-\s+TR5\s+or\s+TR250\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [6pack] Canada - TR5 or TR250 (score: 1): Author: Ashford Little <70tr6@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 11:03:48 -0500; The 40% increase in power probably wasn't accurate. IIRC, the way horsepower was measured was changed about this time from Gross to Net. I think the later PI cars were quoted at about 125hp, which is; /html/6pack/2013-01/msg00023.html (13,540 bytes)
22. Re: [6pack] Canada - TR5 or TR250 (score: 1): Author: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 09:12:28 -0500 (EST); [stuff deleted] And the 9.5:1 compression... that's 10 or 15 HP right there with no other mods (in all likelyhood). Just sayin. regards, rml -- Bob Lang Triumph TR6!! | This space for rent Former NER; /html/6pack/2013-01/msg00026.html (11,381 bytes)
23. Re: [6pack] Canada - TR5 or TR250 (score: 1): Author: Larry Young <cartravel@pobox.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 13:15:34 -0600; When I bought my TR250, my dad tried to persuade me to get a Mustang instead. Both he and my brother had them with plain vanilla 2V 289 (185hp) that he said would do 115 mph. I tried to explain that; /html/6pack/2013-01/msg00028.html (13,119 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 23
Page: [1] [2]