vintage-race
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Introduction & appropriate cars

To: "Susan" <alfasun@esslink.com>, <jeh@world.std.com>,
Subject: Re: Introduction & appropriate cars
From: "Wm. Severin Thompson" <wsthompson@thrunet.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1997 11:22:51 -0600
While the subject of proper vintage cars are being discussed, I must admit
that I'm troubled by the addition of the 3 year old Nascar vehicles, the
IMSA stuff, and the "winged" monoposto doohickies. What's the deal? Just
because a car has become uncompetitive in it's racing organizations
rulebook doesn't make it vintage. Understandably, my attitude can be
perceived as somewhat selfish because my main concern is track time, and
the addition of all these new groups further limits that.

Are these additions being driven (pun intended) by mucky mucks in the
various organizations? Or by "prominent" (read... big dollar) members that
help provide sponsorship? What's the percentage of those of us who make up
these organization that approve of these additions? Is this a hostile take
over? Is "sponsorship" (the precise reason for the inception of vintgae
racing...racing before commercialism) responsible?

I'll sit back and listen for my answer...


Wm. Severin Thompson
Team Thicko

----------
> From: Susan <alfasun@esslink.com>
> To: jeh@world.std.com; vintage-race@autox.team.net; jim hayes
<jeh@world.std.com>
> Cc: vintage-race@autox.team.net; jeh@world.std.com; jeh@world.std.com
> Subject: Re: Introduction
> Date: Tuesday, January 14, 1997 7:25 AM
> 
> jim hayes wrote:
> > 
> > With those low profile 16" Michelins and carbon fibre bits, it'll
really
> > look vintage!
> > Are "vintage" cars like "vintage" wines, where to become "vintage" you
just
> > list the year of manufacture? Or do they need some aging to develop?
> > (Note: having written this bit of sarcasm, I apologize to all I
offended.
> > However, racing cars like this is not, in my never humble opinion,
vintage
> > racing. Neither is having an event like HSR Savannah with 45 incidents,
as
> > was reported here recently. I am truly perturbed......)
> > 
> > > To: deboer@pacbell.net
> > > Cc: vintage-race@autox.team.net
> > > Subject: Re: Introduction
> > >
> > > My Caterham is a 94 produced car and first registered in 95. I got it
> > > through Texas Motor Works.
> > >
> > > I've only had it about a month, it's BRG, I had the Motolita wheel
done
> > > in red suede and I'll be painting the wheels yellow, i.e 1960's Team
> > > Lotus paint scheme. The car is basically as original, it has an
> > > aftermarket ignition to increase performance I believe it came from
> > > Swindon in UK. 16" Michelin Pilot Z rated wheels. The Vauxhall is
fitted
> > > with twin Webers and it seems very quick. It also came with both type
> > > roll bars, weather gear, and standard and Brooklands windscreen.
> > >
> > > I'll be fitting a few Carbon Fibre bits on it, I admit more for looks
> > > than weight.
> > >
> > 
> > Jim Hayes  Vintage racing '57 & '62 Alfa Spiders
> >  jeh@fotec.com              http://www.fotec.com/jim.htm
> > New: The Alfa 'WebCalendar' http://world.std.com/~jeh/calendar/
> > All generalizations, with the possible exception of this one, are
false.
> 
> Well put, Jim. There's a place for cars like this. I think they call it
> SCCA...or something.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>