triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

[Fot] FW: brake pad and rotor discovery and update

Subject: [Fot] FW: brake pad and rotor discovery and update
From: jhasty at mhc-law.com (John H. Hasty)
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:23:40 +0000
References: <1496073395.378283.1531254099121@connect.xfinity.com> <000001d4191c$23b6fac0$6b24f040$@gmail.com> <002101d4192b$ccfd2fa0$66f78ee0$@gmail.com>, <5D3076785B8A61C5.41E5DF95-760C-4BB7-9248-CEC5A8426678@mail.outlook.com>
What is the effect of using TR6 calipers designed for use on 10.75 rotors on 
TR3 11? rotors ?

Sent from my iPhone


As Glenn pointed out ID to OD taper happens with some pads.
Can also be a sign of loose wheel bearings.

But probably as he describes due to higher rubbing speed on OD.

You can easily taper cut the pads with a 4? diamond masonry blade from just 
about any hardware or Lowe?s. You can do it with any number of ways even a 
hacksaw but anything but diamond will wear quickly
Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>






Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2018 8:36 AM
Subject: RE: [Fot] brake pad and rotor discovery and update

Thanks for this report.  We have had some issues with the Carbotech pads on our 
TR4 at Blackhawk and the Kcup.  We use the CT2-XP10 compound.  I will check our 
pad to caliper slot clearance.  Does anyone know offhand of the slot on the 16P 
calipers on our TR4 is the same as the TR3 at 3.095??

Tim Murphy
#317 TR4

Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2018 3:22 PM
Subject: [Fot] brake pad and rotor discovery and update


Hello Friends,

I have been finding out quite a bit about the unusual and developing front 
brake pad, rotor and caliper issues that I have discovered on my TR3.



What I found was that the Carbotech CT-57 pads were causing the problem.



The supporting or backing plates of the pads had been ground down at Carbotech, 
far under the normal plate width that I measured in 4 other production pads 
that I have on hand.  Besides that, they were not ground down squarely.



This allowed the piston to take tremendous side load under braking causing the 
uneven and diagonal wear pattern in the pads.  This also caused the rotor to 
contact the caliper as the pads took on heavy uneven wear.



The slot in the TR6 caliper is 3.095" and the four non-Carbotech pads sets have 
a plate width of no less than 3.082".  The Carbotech plates have an out of 
square measurement of 3.030-3.050".  That's as much as .065" clearance in the 
caliper slot.

The plates have too much clearance.  I found that a maximum of .010" backing 
plate to caliper slot clearance is more normal.  One set of pads have only 
.005" clearance.



Furthermore, the corners of the Carbotech plates and pads were ground down far 
enough that the lower end of the pads hardly made contact with the caliper slot 
allowing more stress on the caliper piston.



I have been going back and forth with Carbotech on this matter and I will be 
sending back the badly worn set along with a brand set that have the same 
production issues.  I bought the two sets at the same time last August.



What I found is that any backing plates that show evidence of sanding or 
grinding marks should be measured for proper clearance, but that really, there 
should be no sanding or grinding marks...ever.



All of the other pads I have show no evidence of sanding or grinding marks.  
The previously shaped friction pads are cleanly attached to the backing plates 
and the backing plate is revealed around the friction material.  Only the 
backing plate makes contact with the caliper slot.



It looks like I have to find another race pad supplier.



Thoughts?



Dave H.

831-234-4928



_______________________________________________

http://www.fot-racing.com

Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20180712/535cec28/attachment.html>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>