triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

[Fot] brake pad and rotor discovery and update

Subject: [Fot] brake pad and rotor discovery and update
From: dlhogye at comcast.net (Dave)
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 10:21:25 -0700
References: <1496073395.378283.1531254099121@connect.xfinity.com> <000001d4191c$23b6fac0$6b24f040$@gmail.com> <1459031586.394619.1531319752990@connect.xfinity.com> <009401d41937$28e8d430$7aba7c90$@prosystembrakes.com>
Thanks a lot, Ashley.  This is excellent information.
Dave H.

Sent from my iPad

> On Jul 11, 2018, at 9:49 AM, Ashley Page <apage at prosystembrakes.com> wrote:
> 
> All good points.
> I have been in the racing brake business for nearly 25 years and worked on 
> them for the 25 prior to that.
> Just adding a few points that are industry standards in my work. Some have 
> been pointed out in emails in this thread ? all good. Hope you find this 
> useful.
>  
> There should be some margin between the friction and steel back plate on the 
> ends where the pad abuts the caliper.
> The pad should never be loaded against the pins that the pads hang from. The 
> pins are there just to keep the pads from falling through -  not to take 
> braking torque. Sadly some pads might need the oval holes opened a little to 
> avoid this; so inspection of all pads is a must.
> The pad should have .5mm (.020?) float end to end in the caliper to insure 
> against drag or hanging up at any temperature.
> New pads should also have after installed .5mm (.020?) float or slop between 
> the caliper piston or brake rotor and the pad to prevent drag.
> The pads should be loose in the caliper and able to be removed with two 
> fingers.
> Pad overhang (friction above the OD of the rotor) or under hang (below the ID 
> of the rotor) is not good. If its not chipping away during track use then 
> knock of the overhang after each event. It can cause piston knock back and a 
> long pedal and or overheating ? in the worst case. You can easily file the 
> friction to the correct radius ? at the expense of a cheep new file per box 
> of pads depending on the friction and size. Don?t use your favorite file for 
> this.
> Pad steel backing plates are made in several ways, stamping, fine blank 
> stamping and, the best, laser cutting. The problem with worn tooling used to 
> stamp or fine blank plates (unfortunately common with old pad shapes) is that 
> the edges of the plate where they abut the caliper are not flat and square. 
> Instead of a ?fine? edge it looks like its been torn and the pad hits on a 
> sharp corner. This starts to put a groove in the caliper abutment area which 
> is not good. If your pads only have less than .020? float end to end and the 
> plates look like crap on the ends then its advisable to file or belt sand the 
> ends of the plates to be closer to square and flat. If the friction is even 
> with the back plate end it can help cause delamination of the friction from 
> the plate.
>  
> The pads we deal with are very old shapes and for the most part today not 
> subject to inspection by OEM?s such as Ford etc. In other words they are just 
> made in small quantity or in some cases carved out of a larger donor pads and 
> sadly some that do this don?t pay attention to details.
>  
> But I am not throwing stones at random. The pads mentioned are all good and 
> work well in the vintage and club racing world. Its just that some pads slip 
> through with problems mentioned. Just a few things to look for in addition to 
> all mentioned prior.
>  
> Also with some brands if you notice a loss of stopping power look at the 
> pads. If they look glazed over then find a smooth piece of concrete somewhere 
> in the paddock or driveway and using a figure 8 pattern lightly grind away 
> the shine on the friction and in most cases they will perform like new. Only 
> takes 2 or 3 figure 8s to clean them up ? don?t overdo it.  
>  
> When the pads are new mark them so that they spend their life in the same 
> place ? i.e. left outer, left inner, right outer, right inner. If you move 
> them around to even out taper or for other reasons you will create a friction 
> surface that is not flat and that is not good.  
>  
> Ashley Page
>  
>  
> From: Fot <fot-bounces at autox.team.net> On Behalf Of DAVE HOGYE via Fot
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2018 10:36 AM
> To: timmmurphh at gmail.com; Friends of Triumph <Fot at autox.team.net>
> Subject: Re: [Fot] brake pad and rotor discovery and update
>  
> Hi Tim,
> 
> Just to clarify, the calipers on my TR3 are the 16PB TR6 units.  They are 
> similar to the 16P, but the P calipers have 1/4" pins and the PBs have 3/16" 
> pins.  The PBs also have a more durable flush seal design that I like.  I 
> open the pin hole to 1/4" for easier pad selection.  If I get a set of pads 
> with 3/16" holes, I just open them to 1/4".  The PB caliper are sometimes 
> referred to as "metric" because the mount holes and the bolt are metric 
> sized.  
> 
> There shouldn't be any evidence of sanding or grinding marks around the edges 
> of the pad backing plate or on the friction pad.  If there is, they are most 
> likely undersize.  
> 
> I have 4 sets of other pads.  2 different Moss compounds, 1 Hawk Blue and an 
> old set of Raybestos that are still new in the box.  None of these pads have 
> any evidence of sanding or grinding on the plate edge.  The edges are cleanly 
> sheared.  
> 
> Also, the plates should be well proud of the friction material and they are 
> on these 4 sets.  On the Carbotech pads, the plates have been ground almost 
> flush to the edge of the friction pad.  So the pad edge is making contact 
> with the caliper slot.  Not good.  
> 
> It totally sucks that I have had to discover and study this matter.  This can 
> be regarded as a serious oversight from Carbotech.   This could be 
> potentially dangerous.  I noticed this through a routine check after an event 
> when one side seemed to be dragging more than the other.  
> 
> Dave H.
> 
> On July 11, 2018 at 6:36 AM timmmurphh at gmail.com wrote:
> 
> Thanks for this report.  We have had some issues with the Carbotech pads on 
> our TR4 at Blackhawk and the Kcup.  We use the CT2-XP10 compound.  I will 
> check our pad to caliper slot clearance.  Does anyone know offhand of the 
> slot on the 16P calipers on our TR4 is the same as the TR3 at 3.095??
> 
>  
> 
> Tim Murphy
> 
> #317 TR4
> 
>  
> 
> From: Fot <fot-bounces at autox.team.net> On Behalf Of DAVE HOGYE via Fot
> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2018 3:22 PM
> To: Friends of Triumph <Fot at autox.team.net>
> Subject: [Fot] brake pad and rotor discovery and update
> 
>  
> 
> Hello Friends,
> 
> I have been finding out quite a bit about the unusual and developing front 
> brake pad, rotor and caliper issues that I have discovered on my TR3.
> 
>  
> 
> What I found was that the Carbotech CT-57 pads were causing the problem.
> 
>  
> 
> The supporting or backing plates of the pads had been ground down at 
> Carbotech, far under the normal plate width that I measured in 4 other 
> production pads that I have on hand.  Besides that, they were not ground down 
> squarely.
> 
>   
> 
> This allowed the piston to take tremendous side load under braking causing 
> the uneven and diagonal wear pattern in the pads.  This also caused the rotor 
> to contact the caliper as the pads took on heavy uneven wear.
> 
>   
> 
> The slot in the TR6 caliper is 3.095" and the four non-Carbotech pads sets 
> have a plate width of no less than 3.082".  The Carbotech plates have an out 
> of square measurement of 3.030-3.050".  That's as much as .065" clearance in 
> the caliper slot.  
> 
> The plates have too much clearance.  I found that a maximum of .010" backing 
> plate to caliper slot clearance is more normal.  One set of pads have only 
> .005" clearance. 
> 
>  
> 
> Furthermore, the corners of the Carbotech plates and pads were ground down 
> far enough that the lower end of the pads hardly made contact with the 
> caliper slot allowing more stress on the caliper piston.
> 
>  
> 
> I have been going back and forth with Carbotech on this matter and I will be 
> sending back the badly worn set along with a brand set that have the same 
> production issues.  I bought the two sets at the same time last August.  
> 
>  
> 
> What I found is that any backing plates that show evidence of sanding or 
> grinding marks should be measured for proper clearance, but that really, 
> there should be no sanding or grinding marks...ever.
> 
>  
> 
> All of the other pads I have show no evidence of sanding or grinding marks.  
> The previously shaped friction pads are cleanly attached to the backing 
> plates and the backing plate is revealed around the friction material.  Only 
> the backing plate makes contact with the caliper slot.  
> 
>  
> 
> It looks like I have to find another race pad supplier.  
> 
>  
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
>  
> 
> Dave H.
> 
> 831-234-4928
> 
>  
> 
> 
>  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20180711/e8e7c3e4/attachment.html>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>