--===============4634379473785159449==
boundary="----=_Part_0_214089782.1462844734505"
------=_Part_0_214089782.1462844734505
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I dunno. Herman once showed me a pile of D type mainshafts all broken in the
same place.
Sure seems like there must be a weak spot there. The equivalent place on a J
type looks at least twice as strong.
YMMV
- Randall
On 9 May 2016 11:28, v6spitfireguy@cox.net <v6spitfireguy@cox.net> wrote:
I don't think that I would worry too much about the differences in the
types as far as strength is concerned. For a GT6, even modified, they are
plenty strong.
------=_Part_0_214089782.1462844734505
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<p>I dunno. Herman once showed me a pile of D type mainshafts all broken in
the same place. <br>Sure seems like there must be a weak spot there. The
equivalent place on a J type looks at least twice as
strong.<br><br>YMMV<br><br>- Randall<br><br>On 9 May 2016 11:28,
v6spitfireguy@cox.net <v6spitfireguy@cox.net> wrote:
<br> I don't think that I would worry too much about the differences in the
<br> types as far as strength is concerned. For a GT6, even modified, they are
<br> plenty strong. </p>
------=_Part_0_214089782.1462844734505--
--===============4634379473785159449==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
** triumphs@autox.team.net **
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
--===============4634379473785159449==--
|