To: | Jonas Payne <jpaynepbr@cox.net>, 'Randall' <TR3driver@ca.rr.com>, triumphs@autox.team.net |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TR] WTB a TR-3 |
From: | Michael Porter <mdporter@dfn.com> |
Date: | Sat, 9 Jan 2016 14:31:55 -0700 |
Delivered-to: | mharc@autox.team.net |
Delivered-to: | triumphs@autox.team.net |
References: | <15227569f75-f88-6787@webprd-m63.mail.aol.com> <3wgT1s00P0NyJgq01wgU3v> <002b01d14b20$7abf9e70$703edb50$@cox.net> |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 |
On 1/9/2016 1:58 PM, Jonas Payne wrote: > According to My "illustrated Triumph Buyers Guide" > > TR2 was rated at 90 BHP > > TR3 was rated at 95 BHP until somewhere shortly after TS13046 > > TR3 was rated at 100 BHP > > TR3B/TR4 was rated at 100 BHP or 105 BHP depending on the source. The > aforementioned book says 100 BHP. (apparently TR4 was available as a 2.0L > or 2.2L?) > > I think all the TR4s were listed as 2138cc. IIRC, the factory manuals listed TR4s as 100 bhp, while the TR4As were listed as 104 bhp, which was attributed to a minor cam profile tweak and the change in exhaust manifolding. Cheers. -- Michael Porter Roswell, NM Never let anyone drive you crazy when you know it's within walking distance.... ** triumphs@autox.team.net ** Archive: http://www.team.net/archive |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TR] VIntage CT, Carl-TR |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TR] WTB a TR-3, Randall |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TR] WTB a TR-3, Jonas Payne |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TR] WTB a TR-3, Randall |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |