triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TR] TR4A crankshaft extension

To: "triumphs@autox.team.net" <triumphs@autox.team.net>, john-marie@sbcglobal.net
Subject: Re: [TR] TR4A crankshaft extension
From: Randall <tr3driver@ca.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 3:53:10 +0000
Authentication-results: cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com smtp.user=tr3driver@ca.rr.com; auth=pass (LOGIN) a=05ChyHeVI94A:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=ayC55rCoAAAA:8 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=0QKRVmLonL4A:10 a=pcLIrrrKAAAA:8 a=dEpjAPV5uoFis4cdGBMA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=ftFGBYpk1mUA:10 a=KOrh491K8B87fFeLgJkoRw==:117
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: triumphs@autox.team.net
Sensitivity: Normal
---- john-marie@sbcglobal.net wrote: 
> In my
> pedestrian mind, seems like less mass in front of the pulley is better. 

As I understand it, the issue is that the crankshaft has a resonant frequency 
(actually several of them), much like a bell does.  At just the right rpm, the 
pulses from the cylinder firings match the resonant frequency and cause the 
crankshaft to "ring" and twist/flex farther than it would normally.  Keep that 
up for long enough, and the metal fatigues and breaks.

The damper works much like holding your hand on a bell, and eliminates the 
ringing.  If someone had been touching the Liberty bell, it might not have 
broken <g>

That said, I've covered over 200,000 miles without a fan or damper; and never 
broken a crankshaft.  I have seen broken crankshafts, but always in racing 
motors that made considerably more than the stock 100 bhp and turned more than 
5000 rpm.  Perhaps it's more of an additive problem.  Or maybe I've just never 
run for long enough at a "problem" rpm.  I've heard it said that the first 
problem is around 5200 rpm, and I don't drive up there very much :)

Randall

** triumphs@autox.team.net **

Archive: http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>