Thanks - that's what I needed to know.
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Wbeech <wbeech@flash.net> wrote:
> There might be a very slight length diff but the two cables will read the
> same if the are able to be properly connected.
>
> Sent from mobile Bill
>
> On Jan 1, 2014, at 5:59 PM, "Lee&John Howard" <leejohn7@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Strange thing.
> My tach cable just broke off at the tip; 1/4 inch tip left inside but
> easily extracted with magnet. I see the cable is easily replaced from the
> usual vendors, although prices vary somewhat. The strange thing is that the
> tach appears to be from a TR3-3B, RN1411/00, rather than the correct
> RN1417/00. At least that is what it seems based on a little Ebay research.
> So, am I getting a faulty reading with my TR3 tach running on my 65 TR4? I
> suppose it doesn't matter a whole lot; I've been tuning by watching the
> tach but can easily use a meter.
> Any thoughts out there?
> Many thanks
>
> John H
>
> ** triumphs@autox.team.net **
>
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> Unsubscribe/Manage:
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/triumphs/wbeech@flash.net
** triumphs@autox.team.net **
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
|