the rear suspension is stock.
--- On Mon, 4/15/13, Bob Labuz <yellowtr@adelphia.net> wrote:
From: Bob Labuz <yellowtr@adelphia.net>
Subject: Re: [TR] TR6 performance
To: "Frank Fisher" <yellowtr3@yahoo.com>
Cc: triumphs@autox.team.net
Date: Monday, April 15, 2013, 6:55 PM
Frank,
I have to agree on the performance. Both my 3 and 4 seem to have a bit more
between 2 and 3k than the 6. The 6 doesnt seem to get it on until about 3200
or so.
The 3 is an 87MM engine. Both the 4 and 6 are stock.
I use the same gas (premium without alcohol). All have Bell exhaust systems,
SU carbs, stock ignition.
As far as the hop in the 6, I have never noticed it. Did your 6 have a stock
rear suspension?
It does squat a bit on hard acceleration.
As far as light rear ends, my 63 4 seems to be the lightest.
Bob
On 04/15/2013 02:27 PM, Frank Fisher wrote:
> drove my friends TR6 the other day and gave it a bit of stick.
> lots of fun. loved the car.
> but i did not feel it was any great improvement over my TR3.
> the one thing i did find a little funy was the way the back end moved
around.
> when driving realativly staright if i drove over say a crack in the road
the
> back would kind of jump to one side..just a little. no big deal. is that
kind
> of normal in an IRS?
> Frank
** triumphs@autox.team.net **
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
|