Subject: | [TR] silicon or regular brake fluic |
---|---|
From: | tr3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall) |
Date: | Thu, 31 Mar 2011 09:13:14 -0700 |
References: | <351923.10199.qm@web65302.mail.ac2.yahoo.com><108a01cbef42$a3b306d0$eb191470$@rr.com> <008701cbef47$3a3242c0$ae96c840$@net> <EB367D99CE3D4862BE6FBA0E2890F52F@Vista> |
> I have heard others say that as well. I am at a loss to figure out why > that is so. In one case that I heard about, the clearances in the MC were so tight that the piston would not return properly with silicone fluid. It's my personal opinion that it would have had trouble in very cold temperatures even with glycol, but the vendor blamed it on the silicone (and refused to warranty the MC). As I recall, the owner gave the bore a few swipes with a hone, and the problem disappeared. But I suspect it has more to do with the potential for silicone to destroy the replacement cylinder business. -- Randall |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TR] silicon or regular brake fluic, Randall |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TR] dot 5 silicone, Gary Nafziger |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TR] silicon or regular brake fluic, Randall |
Next by Thread: | [TR] dot 5 silicone, Gary Nafziger |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |