To: | "list Triumph" <triumphs@autox.team.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TR] more torqueeness, security, etc. |
From: | "dorpaul" <dorpaul@bellsouth.net> |
Date: | Tue, 26 Aug 2008 23:48:17 -0400 |
Could someone explain to me if there is a big difference in the metallurgy between those fasteners that are 'tightened against' each other at 65 ft lbs of torque vs. nearby fasteners receiving merely only 26 ft lbs? I still think it's questionable concerning the loosening of a bolt that might be overly torqued beyond it's 26 ft. lb. limit. Does that mean 'tightening nuts against each other' provides a measure of security? Better than nylock nuts? Does wiring a nut on mean 'tightening it, then drilling a hole thru nut and bolt, then sticking wire thru it? Thanks, Paul -- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. It has removed 900 spam emails to date. Paying users do not have this message in their emails. Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html This list supported in part by the Vintage Triumph Register http://www.vtr.org Triumphs@autox.team.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/triumphs http://www.team.net/archive |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TR] Viagra for wedges, Michael Lang |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TR] more torqueeness, security, etc., MMoore8425 |
Previous by Thread: | [TR] TR3 stignition problem, Corey Sherman |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TR] more torqueeness, security, etc., MMoore8425 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |