triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TR] stamp or engrave?

To: "Bill Davies" <bill@rarebits4classics.co.uk>, "'John Gillis'"
Subject: Re: [TR] stamp or engrave?
From: "John Macartney" <standardtriumph@btinternet.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:56:39 +0100
Wouldn't disagree with any of that, Bill. Very succinctly put :::)))

Jonmac

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Davies" <bill@rarebits4classics.co.uk>
To: "'John Gillis'" <jgillis@tcd.ie>; "'Triumph List'" <triumphs@Autox.Team.Net>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 1:54 PM
Subject: Re: [TR] stamp or engrave?


>> Behalf Of John Gillis
>>  
>> Quick 1- commission plates on early TR's and probably all Triumphs, were
>> the
>> numbers/letters stamped or engraved, 
> 
> John,
> Numbers were always stamped. Characters were 1/8" height until approx 1967,
> 3/16" thereafter. The company used at least three different typefaces in the
> 1/8" pattern. The prefix and main number was block stamped, with the final
> numeric character and any suffixes stamped separately. This means that most
> of the number will be well aligned with equal weight to the stamping, with
> much variation in the weight and position of the final number and suffixes,
> Cheers,
> Bill.
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html
> 
> This list supported in part by the Vintage Triumph Register
> http://www.vtr.org
> 
> 
> Triumphs@autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/triumphs
> 
> You are subscribed as standardtriumph@btinternet.com
> 
> http://www.team.net/archive
_______________________________________________

Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html

This list supported in part by the Vintage Triumph Register
http://www.vtr.org


Triumphs@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/triumphs


http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>