Andy Mace wrote:
> That makes little to no sense to me. The 2000/2500/2.5PI are related to what
> ultimately became the Dolomite mostly in that they share similar styling.
> What ultimately became the Dolomite started in the mid-1960s as the Triumph
> 1300, at that time a front-wheel-drive car. The FWD continued into the 1970s,
> but the car was also redesigned for rear-wheel-drive as the Toledo, still with
> the 1296cc engine. Evolutions of that RWD chassis ended up with the
> slant-4-engined Dolimite.
The 2000/2500/2.5PI range was initially seen as a replacement for the Standard
Vanguard which has
sold so successfully for many years in the world's developing countries. The
Vanguard was tough and
could take abuse in its stride - therefore its successor needed to continue the
tradition. The 2000
(Barb) which apppeared in the early 60's entirely met the requirement. With a
body made by Pressed
Steel Fisher, the 2000 had exceptional torsional rigidity, needing 6,500lbs/ft
of torque to twist
the body one degree. While Michelotti had had the actual styling concepts, it
was the engineers at
ST and PSF who translated GV's inspirations into the Vanguards successor. PSF
was an outstanding
mass producer of bodies for different UK manufacturers and while it was
[obviously] contractually
banned from copying other designs (e.g. the alleged Jaguar X / S types and
Lincoln
"look/smellalikes") it could certainly take ideas and make recommendations
based on its other
manufacturing activities.
In truth, this period of the whole of the Triumph Big Six range of cars,
together with the utterly
delightful little 1300 front wheel drive, was carving out the path that future
Triumph models would
take - until the British government forced the creation of British Leyland and
all the chaos that
followed. The model range was planned to offer substantial value-added in terms
of offering a
product that had significant technological features and improvements, would
echo the Triumphs of
pre-WW2 having sporting and performance characteristics and all packaged into a
car that was very
competitively priced. In the large sedans of the 60's/70's/80's, the little FWD
and the later
Toledo/Dolomite range (to replace Herald and derivatives) you can clearly see
where Triumph would be
going in the marketplace - and it did. These saloons were making money - but
then national
politicians and inter-company 'politics' got in the way and it all went down
the tube.
Jonmac
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
This list supported in part by the Vintage Triumph Register
http://www.vtr.org
Triumphs@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/triumphs
http://www.team.net/archive
|