triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TR] an article for the afternoon...

To: <jimmuller@rcn.com>, "triumphs" <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [TR] an article for the afternoon...
From: "John Macartney" <standardtriumph@btinternet.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 23:18:36 -0000
Jim Muller wrote:>
> Hmmmmmmm.  The writer sez:
>> The Mark IV (now using Roman numerals) replaced the Mark 3 for
>> 1971. Its most outstanding feature was replacement of the old
>> swing axles with a fully articulated independent rear suspension,
>> a la the GT6.
>
> That would have been a nice upgrade but it isn't BL did, unless they
> put a different suspension on the U.S. cars as for Canada cars.  The
> Mk IV got the swing-spring, a variant of the original suspension, not
> the GT6's "fully articulated independent rear suspension".

In addition, he also said that in 1964, the Mk 1 offered a factory hardtop of 
fibreglass. Hmm. Only 
Spitfires I know with factory hardtops had them in steel and up to and 
including the Mk 3 those tops 
were strong enough to hold the car safely upside down.

Jonmac 
_______________________________________________

Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html

This list supported in part by the Vintage Triumph Register
http://www.vtr.org


Triumphs@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/triumphs


http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>