triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TR] Universal Joints: What is the Reason for Replacing

To: <terryrs@comcast.net>, "Anthony Rhodes" <spamiam@comcast.net>,
Subject: Re: [TR] Universal Joints: What is the Reason for Replacing
From: "John Macartney" <standardtriumph@btinternet.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:33:45 -0000
Terry Smith wrote:
>I may have missed it if it's been addressed already.  But what is the List 
>consensus on having the 
>driveshaft professionally balanced when you have it out and are doing the 
>u-joint overhaul?>
> This seems a prudent precaution at least for those who are doing ground ups 
>on unknown cars.  I 
> did it for this reason, and the size counterweight they had to put on would 
>choke a cow.

IMHO if you're doing a complete ground-up rebuild on almost any Triumph, a 
professional balancing 
and re-jointing exercise on the propellor (drive) shaft will be money well 
spent. Propshaft 
vibration on Triumphs was a major headache on all models from Herald and its 
later derivatives 
onwards. Same went for TR and big saloons as well. The most common cause was 
inadequate spot welding 
of the balance weight and it flew of with centrifugal force. I had mine redone 
about four years ago 
and went to the additional precaution of fitting two nylon cable ties around 
either end of the 
balance weight......... just in case:)

Jonmac 
_______________________________________________

Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html

This list supported in part by the Vintage Triumph Register
http://www.vtr.org


Triumphs@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/triumphs


http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>