triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TR] [6pack] TR6 timing Chain Tensioner Question

To: "Sally or Dick Taylor" <tr6taylor@webtv.net>
Subject: Re: [TR] [6pack] TR6 timing Chain Tensioner Question
From: <triumph@2simpleusa.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 08:45:30 -0500
Thanks Dick,

I am sure that Grandma Hoses would have given a more pithy reply!  

You are probably right; I was just surprised at how flimsy the unit is compared 
to those used in small Fords (with a tensioner of about the same length, albeit 
a single row chain).  There is a reference in one of Kastner's articles 
regarding the tensioner, plus the Improving your TR5, 250 and 6 book also 
mentions a means of improving the tensioner ... so I was guessing that someone 
in the list was familiar with how this might be done!

**************
Tony Gordon
72 TR6
**************


>  -------Original Message-------
>  From: Sally or Dick Taylor <tr6taylor@webtv.net>
>  Subject: Re: [6pack] TR6 timing Chain Tensioner Question
>  Sent: Nov 21 '07 02:45
>  
>  Tony---There's probably a better way, but the one designed for the six
>  engine seems to be adequate. The accuracy of the cam timing should be as
>  good as the condition of the chain and sprockets allow, as the chain
>  tensioner is on the back side of things. The spring steel should last
>  quite awhile, since it's constantly bathed in oil.  No need to worry!
>  
>  Dick
>  
>  
>  From:
>  
>  triumph@2simpleusa.com(Tony Gordon)
>  
>  Having now completed the tear down, and having got some of the
>  mechanicals organized, I was looking at the "odd bits and pieces" still
>  to be dealt with, and have come across some references to a need to
>  improve the timing chain tensioner ... and I can see why! The standard
>  bit of bent spring steel doesn't inspire any confidence!
>  Surely there has to be a better way of providing tension?   I seem to
>  recall from my experiences with UK 4 cylinder engines (mostly Ford or
>  Lotus-Ford 4) that spring-loaded hard rubber
>  blocks were the norm, and that you could
>  
>  increase the tension to hold timing
>  
>  at the cost of more frequent timing cover tear downs).
>  Is there anything better out there, or am I worrying unnecessarily?
>  **************************************
>  Tony Gordon
>  72 TR6
>  **************************************
>  
>  Your messages not reaching the list?
>  Check out http://www.team.net/posting.html
>  
>  ===  Help keep Team.Net on the air
>  ===     http://www.team.net/donate.html
>  
>  ===  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
>  ===  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
>  ===  Other lists available at
>  ===      http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
>  ===  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive
>  ===  http://www.team.net/the-local
>  ===  Edit your replies!
_______________________________________________

Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html

This list supported in part by the Vintage Triumph Register
http://www.vtr.org

http://www.team.net/donate.html

Triumphs@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/triumphs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>