John:
I can only speak for myself, but the list would be a lesser resource without
your insights. I believe you are the only list member that was actively
involved (albeit primarily from the sales end) in the production of these
cars and I have found you to be a veritable fount of knowledge and lore
about the cars that we all love. I am not sure where Nolan discerned
"attitude" in your original note, nor did I find your reply to be
provocative or offensive. Maybe Nolan is having a bad day. Anyway, stay
subscribed, please!
Mike
>> >More coolant, more tubes, more fins but using current radiator
>>>manufacturing materials and techniques in preference to those of the
>>>1960's. That's how we use the inferred term *state of the art* in the UK.
>>>I
>>>thought that was how it would be interpreted elsewhere. Obviously I was
>>>mistaken.
>
> Nolan replied
>
>> That would be the attitude I was referring to.
>> I'd say best of luck to you, but with the way to act, to hell with you.
>
> The absence of smileys and/or emoticons in the last line leaves me feeling
> rather puzzled. If this is a majority feeling of the list, I'm quite
> willing
> to unsubscribe - or would someone please tell me where my *attitude* is
> seen
> or perceived as offensive? At no time in my submissions did I ever query
> anyone's logic of whether it was better to push or pull - but to merely
> put
> a point of view which anyone can challenge.
_______________________________________________
This list supported in part by the Vintage Triumph Register
http://www.vtr.org
Triumphs mailing list
Triumphs@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/triumphs
|