triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TR] dimness improved?

To: "Randall" <tr3driver@ca.rr.com>, <Triumphs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [TR] dimness improved?
From: "Paul Dorsey" <dorpaul@negia.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:58:38 -0400
Today I returned to Radio Shack where I saw that although bulb #52 is 
similar in size to the original bulb.
However, Bulb #46 is similar in some ways, but, maybe 3/16" longer in glass.

Although I cannot speak from personal experience, I've heard that the 
original panel lights were too dim.  This extra glass may in fact, make up 
for this dimness as it would protude from the center console's barrel-type 
bulb holder.  I have not tried it in the speedometer and tach.

I have been told Bulb #52 will fit our cars, however, I am wondering if Bulb 
#46 as it is 3/16" longer.  On the back of the packaging is this info:

Rated current: Bulb #52 is 100mA,  Bulb#46 is 200mA- does this necessarily 
mean twice the heat?  Is that a MAJOR PROBLEM???????????????????
Both bulbs are 14v
Output (Candle Power rating?) Bulb #52 is 0.75 MSCP, Bulb #46 is 1.4 MSCP
 MOST SHOCKING info: Average Life (hours)  for both bulb types is only 30 
hours?????????????????

Hopefully, someone can shed some light (NPI) on this issue.

Thanks, Paul Dorsey  60 TR3 


===  This list supported in part by The Vintage Triumph Register
===     http://www.vtr.org



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>