To: | "R. Ashford Little II" <70TR6@mindspring.com>, |
---|---|
Subject: | [TR] Re: What should the new Triumph look like? |
From: | "John Macartney" <standardtriumph@btinternet.com> |
Date: | Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:41:10 +0100 |
R. Ashford Little II wrote: >A new Triumph would have to be rwd to be a Triumph. Why? One of the Triumphs you guys in the States were never offered was front wheel drive and extremely successful in the many markets in which it was offered. It was the 1300 Saloon which opened out to a 1500 - and later became a Dolomite. Jonmac === This list supported in part by The Vintage Triumph Register === http://www.vtr.org |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TR] What should the new Triumph look like?, zoboherald |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TR] What should the new Triumph look like?, oliver |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TR] What should the new Triumph look like?, MMoore8425 |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TR] Re: What should the new Triumph look like?, ZoboHerald |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |