To: | "Triumph List" <triumphs@autox.team.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TR] Return on investment when restoring a Stag and other |
From: | "oliver" <sumton@sbcglobal.net> |
Date: | Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:26:02 -0500 |
i honestly think the two are contradictory. your best bet is to find a car (mg, healey, triumph, etc) which has been well restored. take good care of it and it will take good care of you. the less you spend on a car up front, the more you will have to fix, repair, replace. However, if I picked another Triumph or say an MG to work on, which > model would involve the least amount of investment, and least amount of > lose? > Sujit === This list supported in part by The Vintage Triumph Register === http://www.vtr.org |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [TR] Return on investment when restoring a Stag and other, Randall |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TR] TRIALS 2006 - Hotel Information, TR250Driver |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [TR] Return on investment when restoring a Stag and other, Randall |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TR] Return on investment when restoring a Stag and other, MMoore8425 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |