To: | 6-Pack <6pack@Autox.Team.Net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Flywheel:How lite is too lite? |
Date: | Fri, 10 Dec 2004 21:08:17 -0700 |
Cc: | "triumphs@autox.team.net" <triumphs@Autox.Team.Net> |
References: | <Pine.OSF.4.10.10412101141170.16306-100000@isis.mit.edu> |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) |
Well, I just weighed an early crank before shipping it to Ontario, and with box, it is 66#, so 64# is just right! Bill Slightly Classics Tucson Robert M. Lang wrote: >On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, Kai M. Radicke wrote: > > > >>Bob Lang wrote: >> >> >> >>>Keep in mind two things about flywheel mass as it related to >>>TR6's - the stock crank weighs in at darn close to 80 pounds... >>> >>> >>I think Bob's TR6 needs to go on a low carb diet or something, because his >>crank is morbidly overweight! 64lbs is pretty much spot on for stock 70-76 >>TR6 crankshafts. >> >> > >Umm... my cranks are def lighter than that. :-0 > >How about 80 pounds _with the flywheel_? |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: Silicone Brake Fluif in Hyd Clutch?, Joe Curry |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Flywheel:How lite is too lite?, Bill McLeod |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Flywheel:How lite is too lite?, Robert M. Lang |
Next by Thread: | Re: Flywheel:How lite is too lite?, Bill McLeod |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |