Message text written by "Randall"
>Ok, Dave, now I'm going to disagree with you. The SU design was every bit
>capable of being "cleaned up" as the ZS was, the switch to ZS carbs was
for
>economic reasons, not engineering ones. Comparing a 70's CDSEV to a 50's
H6
>is like criticizing an apple because it's the wrong shade of orange ...
True but even these don't tune like the old H6's or even the HS6's.
>I would love to know which SCCA classification outlaws the original carbs
>... frankly I think this is either a mistake or a gross distortion. The
>only way I can imagine this would be true would be some sort of "intake
>limited" class, where the 1.75" throats are above the limit.
Most likely. Dennis Wilson raced a TR6 in the late 70's (whn the factory
was campaigning the TR7) and got 250 HP out of Strombergs. His opinion is
that you can put more air through a Stromberg than through an SU.
Dave
Check out the new British Cars Forum:
http://www.team.net/the-local/tiki-view_forum.php?forumId=8
|