To: | "Dave Massey" <105671.471@compuserve.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Tub Weight / was frame weight |
From: | "Fred Thomas" <vafred@erols.com> |
Date: | Thu, 9 Oct 2003 14:19:07 -0400 |
Cc: | "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>, "Dave Massey" <105671.471@compuserve.com>, "J.C. Hassall" <jhassall@blacksburg.net>, <triumphs@autox.team.net> |
References: | <200310091311_MC3-1-5213-DABB@compuserve.com> |
True. Lifting at the wheel arches is probalby best but, if you are starting with the body along side the frame one is severly tempted to lift from the ends so as to avoid stepping over the frame. Lifting at the wheel arches (which also requires 4 people min) would require the near side guys to clamber over the frame and suspension and engine (etc) backwards carrying a heavy object. Not my idea of fun. Better to start with the body directly ahead of or behind the frame (space allowing). Dave ========================================================= Lift the tub from both sides and just walk strainght backward or forward, no frame to step on at all, I've done a few, very easy really. "FT" |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Tub Weight / was frame weight http://netwinsite.com/top_mail.htm, pethier |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re Re: Battery box, Paul Dorsey |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Tub Weight / was frame weight, Dave Massey |
Next by Thread: | Re: Tub Weight / was frame weight, Fred Thomas |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |