triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TR3 Ring Gap

To: "Bill Brewer" <bbrewer@qnet.com>
Subject: Re: TR3 Ring Gap
From: mporter@zianet.com
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 22:46:33 -0600
Cc: "Triumphs" <triumphs@autox.team.net>, "Jon Paschke" <JPASCHKE@bak.rr.com>, lzaninovich@bak.rr.com
References: <002401c37d97$549cc600$54d4ddd1@bbrewer>
Bill Brewer writes: 

>      The piston rings were very tight with no end gap.
>      My two manuals list two different ring end gaps. My Bentley manual
> states that they should be .003" to .015", which is quite a spread. My
> Haynes manual has it a bit higher at .015" to .038". A good friend of mine
> suggests .010. He feels that tighter may cause the rings to break.

My guess is that the Bentley figure might be a typo. Typically, for a stock 
engine, the low side would be 0.003" per bore inch. For an 86mm bore, that 
would be 0.010". The outside, which I'd recommend if you're planning on 
running the engine hard, is 0.004" per bore inch, or 0.013-0.014".
Sometimes, it's a good idea to gap to the high side of the spec for the top 
ring, since it runs hotter than the rings underneath it. It's been a while 
since I've pulled apart a wet-sleeve engine, but it always seemed that the 
top rings were broken.... 

Cheers.




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>