triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: spelling no lbc

To: triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: spelling no lbc
From: don spence <dspence@oanet.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:28:13 -0600
> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 19:06:09 -0400
> From: "Fred Thomas" <vafred@erols.com>
> Subject: spelling
>
> "DIAPHRAGM" !!!!!!!  "FT"

Form a daer firned of mnie:


 

Aoccdrnig to a rscheearchr at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer
in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is
taht the frist and lsat ltteer is at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a
toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae
we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe.




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>