triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

[Fwd: Re: Port Matching]

To: "triumphs@autox.team.net" <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Subject: [Fwd: Re: Port Matching]
From: Don Malling <dmallin@attglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 09:03:29 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Port Matching
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 07:53:22 -0400
From: Don Malling <dmallin@attglobal.net>
To: john donnelly <pdonnel1@san.rr.com>
CC: "Triumphs List (E-mail)" <triumphs@autox.team.net>
References: <000101c32d78$acd93f70$0200a8c0@toshibauser>


FWIW, I believe in David Vizard's book on the "A" series engine, he
recommends that the exhaust header be larger than the head's exhaust
port. It has something to do with reducing back pressure. He recommends
that the head's intake ports me matched with the intake manifold.

Don Malling



john donnelly wrote:
 > I was looking through David Vizard's Tuning Standard Triumphs and found a
 > section that discussed matching the port openings between the head 
and the
 > intake/exhaust manifolds. So I checked mine and found two of the exhaust
 > ports were offset by about 3/16 inch. Since the exhaust manifold openings
 > are bigger than head openings I didn't think it'd be worth the extra 
effort
 > since no restrictions exist.
 >
 > Has anybody did port matching? Was it a noticeable improvement?
 >
 > Thanks!
 > John in San Diego
 > '67 TR4A IRS

///  triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>