Irv wrote:
> > There's no substitute for cubic inches.
And Francois wrote:
> Actually, cubic inches WERE substituted long ago by cubic cm
> or their liter equivalent...
Neither cubic inches nor cubic centimeters are a substitute for cubic money.
Absent an engine change, the cubic capacity of a TR engine is limited, but
the ability of the car to absorb money is infinite.
And conversion of metric units should be easy - a litre is precisely one
martini more than a quart (several personally conducted field experiments
have confirmed this to my satisfaction).
Jim Hill
/// triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list
/// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
/// with nothing in it but
///
/// unsubscribe triumphs
///
/// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
|