triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

English gallons verses U.S gallons, no-LBC

To: triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject: English gallons verses U.S gallons, no-LBC
From: GuyotLeonF@aol.com
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 16:04:40 EDT
OK all,

You know they are different, but do you know why?

No, neither did I, but I just found out and thought I would share it with you.

Before the American revolution when British colonies used weights and 
measures supposedly equivalent to those used in England.

The system of standard weights and measures wasn't well established in 
Britian and many standard copies taken to America differed from place to 
place.

Thus the U.S. bushel and gallon, and their subdivisions, often differed from 
the corresponding British units, causing many arguments between traders.

So the colonies adopted the British Wine gallon of 231 cubic inches - but 
England was then using not only the wine gallon, but also the ale gallon of 
282 cubic inches.

In 1824 Parliament established the British Imperial gallon as 277.42 cubic 
inches (the volume occupied by 10 lb of distilled water at room temperature).

Thus the American gallon, which remained at 231 cubic inches is about 17 per 
cent smaller.

To confuse things even further, the American fluid ounce is slightly larger 
than the British because the U.S. pint, (one-eight of a U.S. gallon) is 
divided into 16 fluid ounces.

In Britain the pint, though larger, is equivalent to 20 fluid ounces.  

(information courtesey of the daily mail, August 23 2001)

Curious huh?

Leon

///  triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list
///  To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
///  with nothing in it but
///
///     unsubscribe triumphs
///


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • English gallons verses U.S gallons, no-LBC, GuyotLeonF <=