triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Old Cars and California License Plate politics - non CA listerscan

To: Randall Young <ryoung@NAVCOMTECH.COM>
Subject: Re: Old Cars and California License Plate politics - non CA listerscan delete!
From: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 08:44:27 -0700
Cc: "Triumph Team. Net" <triumphs@autox.team.net>
References: <NCBBKDNEEKEOHAOIIOIIOEJIENAA.ryoung@navcomtech.com>
Randall,
In the years those STC plats were being used, Triumph's model year was the same 
as the year the car was manufactured.  It was only after the addition
of the extra plate that the model year changed to that of the US cars.  This is 
what prompts the question.  Do they use the REAL model year of the
Updated one???  

As an additional note, when my son moved from Washing to California, he tried 
to get the original model year reinstated when he registered the car in
CA.  He determined that it was just too much trouble trying to convince the 
authorities that it really is a 65 and not a 66 as the plate says.  So he
left it as it was.

Joe

Randall Young wrote:
> 
> Joe Curry wrote :
> >
> > Will STC cars be able to run their "REAL" year of manufacture plates
> > or the bogus year plates annotated by the STC plate???   :)
> 
> The bill as written specifies 'year of manufacture', not 'year first sold',
> which implies to me that the "real" year would be used.  Of course, it also
> says 'model year', which isn't the same as 'year of manufacture', so who
> knows ?
> 
> As Brad said, it most likely depends on the whim of your DMV representative.
> I can't imagine why the DMV would care what year plate you used, but I'm
> convinced that some of their people just like saying "No".
> 
> Randall

///
///  triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list
///


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: Old Cars and California License Plate politics - non CA listerscan delete!, Joe Curry <=