Subject: | Re: Spitfire 1500 tools |
---|---|
From: | Randall Young <randallyoung@earthlink.net> |
Date: | Sat, 24 Feb 2001 12:08:09 -0800 |
Cc: | triumphs@autox.team.net |
References: | <3.0.1.32.20010223175603.007b9d90@pop.xs4all.nl> <V3y05qJ6ahl6EwoK@hargreave-mawson.demon.co.uk> <3.0.1.32.20010223175603.007b9d90@pop.xs4all.nl> <nsUIfDKjSql6EweH@hargreave-mawson.demon.co.uk> <3.0.1.32.20010223220341.00887320@pop.xs4all.nl> <ZR+XwhKJk3l6EwLx@hargreave-mawson.demon.co.uk> <3A97A19F.DFC0943A@zianet.com> |
"Michael D. Porter" wrote: > Cheap analog meter. For emergency > work, will do as much or more as a digital meter, but cheaper and about > as robust. Michael : I feel compelled to disagree on this point. Most cheap analog meters will go up in smoke the first time you try to measure the resistance of your charged car battery, and quit working the first time they fly off the fender in a truck's backwash. With digital meters available for under $10 (on sale at HF), I can't see any reason to carry an analog. Digital meters are also smaller, lighter, and have useful features like audible continuity (which can be real handy if you're laying on the back of your neck under the dash, trying to find a problem). Randall /// /// triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list /// |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Did TR give or get the "Tractor" motor ?, Randall Young |
---|---|
Next by Date: | re:TR4 overdrive: secret agent man, Anthony Rhodes |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Spitfire 1500 tools, Michael D. Porter |
Next by Thread: | Re: Spitfire 1500 tools, Geo Hahn |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |