| Subject: | Re: TR6: why two valve springs? |
|---|---|
| From: | Randall Young <randallyoung@earthlink.net> |
| Date: | Mon, 11 Dec 2000 10:16:31 -0800 |
| Cc: | Triumphs <triumphs@autox.team.net> |
| References: | <3A346E82.8E29D4FA@mweb.co.za> <3A347147.E7B620D4@earthlink.net> <3A34E5EC.22C51A9@gte.net> |
I'll agree the tension is important (critical even), but it's easy (and cheaper) to make a single spring that has enough tension. Randall Joe Curry wrote: > > How about the fact that because of the increased spring tension enabling the >engine to be revved higher without floating the valves! > > Joe |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Whitworth was: weights & measures . com>, Mike Kitchener |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Starter wont..., Fred Thomas |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: TR6: why two valve springs?, Randall Young |
| Next by Thread: | The Stag runs again..., David Greed |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |