To: | "Bob Danielson" <75trsix@snet.net>, "Triumph" <triumphs@autox.team.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Haynes vs. Bentley |
From: | "Scoti" <scoti@iol7.com> |
Date: | Sun, 13 Feb 2000 08:19:47 -0800charset="iso-8859-1" |
References: | <LPBBIJIFJOGKGDBLMLNNIEAKCGAA.75trsix@snet.net> |
Bob, You wrote: >>For a TR6 which of the two is the better manual to have: Haynes or Bentley. I'm thinking in reference to completeness, ease of understanding, accuracy etc.<< I just finished a engine/OD transplant into my 73 TR6 and found that I used them both almost equally. Yes, the Bentley was laid out differently, yes they both were vague in places. Yes, they both had mistakes. And yes, they conflicted with each other. But I wouldn't want to do it with out either one. Dana |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Cleaning Wire Wheels, ArthurK101 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | GT6 work shop book needed, Douglas Hansen |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Haynes vs. Bentley, Martin A. Secrest |
Next by Thread: | Re: Haynes vs. Bentley, suhring |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |