triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Mustang...Spitfire???

To: DANMAS@aol.com
Subject: Re: Mustang...Spitfire???
From: Susan and John Roper <vscjohn@huntnet.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 10:58:37 -0600
Cc: ArthurK101@aol.com, spitlist@gte.net, triumphs@autox.team.net
Organization: Vintage Sporting Cars
References: <d0a9a398.36ee8aae@aol.com>
You may know her better than I Dan, but the same does not apply to the
Falstang.  the guts of the beast are the same, same platform, same mechanicals,
just a nicer party dress and higher heels.  John

DANMAS@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 3/16/99 11:29:32 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> vscjohn@huntnet.net writes:
>
> > Art, The original Mustang was nothing more than a Falcon with different
> sheet
> > metal
> >  and a bit more wheelbase.
>
> John,
>
> That's sorta like saying Pam Anderson is nothing more than a man with
> different genitalia and a softer body.
>
> Dan Masters,
> Alcoa, TN
>
> '71 TR6---------3000mile/year driver, fully restored
> '71 TR6---------undergoing full restoration and Ford 5.0 V8 insertion - see:
>                     http://members.aol.com/danmas/
> '74 MGBGT---3000mile/year driver, original condition - slated for a V8 soon
> '68 MGBGT---organ donor for the '74




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>