triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Fans revisited

To: <DANMAS@aol.com>, <105671.471@compuserve.com>
Subject: RE: Fans revisited
From: "Kim and Kelly Alford" <alfords@seanet.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 18:27:58 -0800charset="iso-8859-1"
Cc: <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Importance: Normal
You are all correct.  However, when you press the nitrous oxide button, who
really cares how much HP the fan robs you of.

Kelly Alford

-----Original Message-----
From:   owner-triumphs@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-triumphs@autox.team.net]
On Behalf Of DANMAS@aol.com
Sent:   Monday, March 15, 1999 4:20 PM
To:     105671.471@compuserve.com
Cc:     triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject:        Re: Fans revisited


In a message dated 3/15/99 6:07:02 PM Eastern Standard Time,
105671.471@compuserve.com writes:

> >I agree, but there is another advantage to using a mechanical fan - if
the
>  >engine is running, the fan is running.
>
>  Until the belt breaks.  ;-)

Ah, but there is no belt involved on a TR6 - the fan is driven directly from
the crank!

Dan Masters,
Alcoa, TN

'71 TR6---------3000mile/year driver, fully restored
'71 TR6---------undergoing full restoration and Ford 5.0 V8 insertion - see:
                    http://members.aol.com/danmas/
'74 MGBGT---3000mile/year driver, original condition - slated for a V8 soon
'68 MGBGT---organ donor for the '74


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>