triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: BS AU48 1965

To: jonmac@ndirect.co.uk
Subject: Re: BS AU48 1965
From: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 10:32:27 -0800
Cc: Triumphs List <triumphs@Autox.Team.Net>
Organization: Curry Enterprises
References: <199811181726.RAA25184@sioux.netdirect.net.uk>
John,
Thanks for the response.  I thought it might be something like that, but
wanted to check for sure.  It's a good bet that we won't see that on any
plates before 1965, then!  8^)

jonmac wrote:
> 
> > In researching a rather peculiar commission plate on a Mk3
> Spitfire, I
> > noticed the referenced alpha numeric sequence at the bottom.  In my
> > search for an explanation of this sequence, I have seen this on
> several
> > commission plates for both Spitfires and GT6's.
>  > In addition ot what I referenced above, some plates have it with
> > punctuation marks as follows:
> >         B.S. A.U.48:1965
>  > My questions here are:
>  > 1.  Does anybody know the significance of this series?
> > 2.  Is this series repeated on other Triumphs as well?
> 
> Hi, Joe
> 
> I checked today with Rover Research and Development at GDEC.
> 
> This is quite an old number which has been superceded and the problem
> is you can't go backwards from the current number (which is
> completely different anyway). B.S. means British Standard A.U. means
> Authority. Then 48.1965 relates to an official UK certification
> relating to the conformity of seat belt anchorages. At least, that's
> what R&D believe it to be.
> 
> For the record, British Standards are all encompassing and cover a
> whole multitude of minimum operating requirements. The number was not
> selective in terms of the cars to which it was fixed. It was a UK
> legal requirment for the number to be stamped on all commission
> plates - regardless of the eventual destination of the vehicle.
> 
> Regards
> John Mac

-- 
"If you can't excel with talent, triumph with effort."
  -- Dave Weinbaum in National Enquirer


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>