Re: BMH Body shells

["\"Mr. Mike\" Passaretti" <passaretti@sol.med.ge.com>]

>>>>> "William" == William Davies <w.davies@virgin.net> writes:

    William> If BMH had seen a better return
    William> on their investment in the TR6 shell, I suspect
    William> we would have seen more Triumph shells
    William> remanufactured. Perhaps a Spitfire shell would
    William> have been a better choice as their first Triumph
    William> shell?  Not a flame, just a little information
    William> not greatly publicised in Triumph circles, Best
    William> regards, Bill.

I, for one, would love to see the TR4/4A shell redone, but I'm
not holding my breath.  I think the real reason is that MGBs
were made for years and remained roughly the same from
60's(?)-80's but the TR went through 3 bodies in that time. (4-8)
It's a volume thing.
                                                        -MM