triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Dissimilar metals

To: "'triumphs@autox.team.net'" <triumphs@Autox.Team.Net>
Subject: RE: Dissimilar metals
From: Gernot Vonhoegen <gernot.vonhoegen@stir.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 14:26:17 -0000

The metal underneath should be painted at least. The problem then is not
the metal parts but the bolts that hold it. If you are really concerned,
fit a piece of wing piping uder the thing. Boltwise, you might use some
of those plastic covered bolts. Not that I would go to that length,
but...

Gernot
> ----------
> From:         wises@execpc.com[SMTP:wises@execpc.com]
> Reply To:     wises@execpc.com
> Sent:         Sunday, March 08, 1998 8:36 PM
> To:   triumphs@autox.team.net
> Subject:      Dissimilar metals 
> 
> 
> Dear Triumph Intelligensia
> 
> Upon delivery of my TR3 body and associated parts to the paint shop,
> the
> owner expressed some concern about placing the aluminum rear fender
> stone
> guards directly against the steel of the body.  Dissimilar metals have
> a
> tendency to eat each other away rather rapidly due to Galvanic action.
> My
> only response was, "Geez, they been doing it this way for 40 years".
> Has
> anybody else worried about this and, better yet, has anyone come up
> with a
> solution?
> 
> Galvanically yours,
> 
> Bob Wise
> '61 TR3A (finally getting a Primrose Yellow paint job after 11 years
> of
> sitting in the garage)
> 
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>