i'll look at the comission plate and see, but i don't think the c is on
the end of the commssion number, from memory, it's fm99248u feb 1979 and
the paint code 93 and trim c71 are the only numbers and such on the
plate. the reason i remember is because of you wanting the info for
your database and me getting the comm number off of the registration and
it being too high of a number. i'll look again tonight just to be sure
so we can save some confusion.
----Original Message Follows----
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 23:42:28 -0800
From: Joe Curry <curry@wolfenet.com>
To: Larry Hooven <dirty_howi@hotmail.com>
CC: carbuff@scooter.net, triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: 1979 spitfire emissions hoses
Larry,
Didn't you tell em the Commission Number is 99248U? If So, according to
my
reference material this is a Federal Car and not a California Car. Now
It
could be that it has been converted to California Emissions standards if
it
was brought in from out of state. However, if it has a UC suffix, it
would
be a California Spit. I don;t know what the current California
standards
require, especially since the recent passage of that legislation. It
may
save you some headaches if you check into the requirements.
Joe
Larry Hooven wrote:
> joe et al, it is indeed a california spit, not a non california spit,
> in looking at it today (finally got the wife's dodge out of the shop)
> the two bottom hoses connect together, but in every diagram i have
seen
> there is a ARS hooked between the two, i don't have one, just straight
> hose connection between the two bottom connections of the canisters.
i
> am still hoping someone at least knows someone with a cal spit that
they
> can take poloroids or something of or at least a 123456 b1 b2
> description for me, im still confused, thats why i liked the old cars
> and trucks no emmissions (not unlike joe) requirement, easy to swork
on
> . tia.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
|