Ed,
On later 1500 Spits, it makes no difference which side of the spring
faces forward. As a matter of fact, when the car starts taking on a list
to port, the spring can be turned end-for-end to add to it's useable
life. And, even with a new spring, depending on driver's initial weight
and number of beers they consumed during a Spitfire's ownership, lean
can come on quickly.
On the early Mk I, and maybe the Mk II, there was a difference in the
way the spring went on. I believe the chamfered edge went forward. Years
ago I heard the reason, but I'll be danged if I can remember it
now--something about clearance, or the way it attached to the diff.
Andy Mace, are you listening?
Charlie B.
> I appreciate your response -- nice to know its not just me. On a 1500, you
>can tell the
> difference between the front/rear of the spring. There is a machined edge at
>the center of
> the main leaf (the one with the bushings). This machined or flat spot, at
>the center of the
> leaf, denotes the front. I agree with you, there seems to be no geometric
>difference in the
> spring. I've made measurements from center point left and center point right
>-- all is the
> same. The spring I removed was backwards. The car, meanwhile, sat level and
>seemed to
> handle properly; although I only have a few hundred miles behind the wheel of
>it. Now, if
> your right, and turning the spring over will cause it to list (port or
>starboard), then I
> suppose I should replace the spring as it
> was -- backwards. I would break into tears if I spun the spring around,
>properly, put it
> all back together only to find it lopsided. I don't need the practice of
>taking it out
> again.
>
> Regards,
> Ed Hamilton
> '80 Spit -- level while on jack stands.
|