triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Unleaded gas; Chevron's view

To: Andy <adixon@loudoun.com>
Subject: Re: Unleaded gas; Chevron's view
From: Joe Curry <curry@wolfenet.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 11:03:45 -0800
Cc: triumphs@Autox.Team.Net
Organization: Curry Enterprises
References: <0EL3AVL0D00HKW@mail.cninc.com>

Andy wrote:

> Here's their response:-
>
> "I am not aware of any inherent chemical properties of current unleaded
> gasoline that would prevent valve seat sink under the "right" service
> conditions in cars with valve seats that are not hardened. Nor do I
> believe that many unleaded gasolines contain an additive to compensate
> for the lack of lead.  Chevron's unleaded gasolines don't.  However, it
> is Chevron's belief that using unleaded gasoline in older cars with
> valve seats that are not hardened does not present a problem for most
> types of service.  This is should be particularly true for the light
> service most antique sports cars see.  Valve seat sink only becomes a
> risk at higher than normal engine temperatures generated by operation at
> sustained high speeds and/or loads.  Please see our technical bulletin
> on the subject at www.chevron.com/chevron_root/prodserv/index.html.

Andy,
It sounds like their description, "higher than normal engine temperatures
generated by operation at sustained high speeds and/or loads" pretty well sums 
up
the normal operation of our beloved LBC's.  So based on that, I think you made 
the
right decision.

Joe Curry  '63 Spit


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>