To: | Peter Lucas <pllj@earthlink.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Mk3 spitfire suspension upgrade<347CDD12.374F@earthlink.net> |
From: | RICHARD.JACKSON@NENE.AC.UK |
Date: | Thu, 27 Nov 1997 09:14:55 +0000 (GMT) |
Cc: | Andrew Mace <amace@unix2.nysed.gov>, Jonathan Miles <MILESJE@novell2.bham.ac.uk>, timm01@cs.soaks.kent.sch.uk, triumphs@Autox.Team.Net, RICHARD.JACKSON@NENE.AC.UK |
References: | <Pine.SOL.3.91.971126153601.29039D-100000@unix2.nysed.gov> |
>Andrew, > The later half shafts are longer by a 1/2" EACH! Together they equal >1". When swaping to a swing spring setup, (the spring is 1" longer than >that of earlier models), you need to also replace the half shafts to >make up this 1" difference. Otherwise you'll be driving on your >sidewalls and that wont add to better handeling. Sorry Pete, But I'm with Andy on this one, they are 1 inch longer each, and the swing spring for early(short shaft) MkIV's and later(longer shaft) MkIV's is the same! Now it may be longer than the standard fixed spring of the Mk3, I don't know. Rich England. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Mk3 spitfire suspension upgrade<347C6E2B.2AE8@earthlink.net>, RICHARD.JACKSON |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: FW: Laser anecdote<347CFCD8.1A5A@popmail.firn.edu>, RICHARD.JACKSON |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Mk3 spitfire suspension upgrade<347C6E2B.2AE8@earthlink.net>, RICHARD.JACKSON |
Next by Thread: | Re: FW: Laser anecdote<347CFCD8.1A5A@popmail.firn.edu>, RICHARD.JACKSON |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |