triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42

To: <tom.omalley@channel1.com>, <triumphs@Autox.Team.Net>
Subject: Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42
From: "Mark A. Erickson" <mlazye@northvalley.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 1997 18:12:14 -0700
Cc: <tboicey@brit.ca>
"Ammoco" was one of the high performance fuels of the sixties. My parents
used only Ammoco in both their 55 Buick Century and (my favorite) my dads
1957 TR-3. I used it in my "souped-up" lawn mower. We had no one problem
what so ever with any engine. In 1963 the Buick became mine, did a
compression (over 100,000 mile) found one bent valve, problem with the
fuel--NO. The valves and seats were so good that they did not require a
grind or a reseat.

If I remember correctly, Ammoco Supreme was 102 octane. If they could do it
then why can't we have 100 octane now??

Mark

----------
> From: tom.omalley@channel1.com
> To: triumphs@autox.team.net
> Cc: tboicey@brit.ca
> Subject: Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42
> Date: Saturday, September 27, 1997 12:40 PM
> 
> Trevor writes:
> 
> >  Lead sucks. Frankly, we've been without it forever,
> >and I don't see the massive automotive carnage that
> >the british auto press seems to like portray.
> 
> I hope our UK friends don't get too upset about the lead thing.
> Trevor's right...we have been running without it forever and it
> doesn't seem to be causing any serious problems.
> 
> Unleaded fuel has actually been *available* <in the Unites States, not
> sure about Canada> since the early sixties.
> 
> Anyone remember seeing Bob Hope on TV wearing his nifty red cap
> hawking "Unleaded Ammoco"?  This fuel was being hyped as a performance
> enhancement that prevented fouling of spark plugs from lead deposits.
> Nothing to do with emissions...WAY too early for that.
> 
> AFAIK, all grades of Ammoco sold in the sixties were unleaded.  Since
> this was a major brand, that says that one heck of a lotta really old
> cars were using unleaded even then.  If Ammoco was deluged with
> lawsuits from folks who damaged their engines I missed hearing about
> it.
> 
> Okay...I don't know for a fact that "Unleaded Ammoco" was completely
> free of lead...we only knew what the Ad copy told us.
> 
> Still...my own empirical data looks pretty good.  My '74 Plymouth ran
> 100k of it's 240k miles on unleaded fuel...never had the head off.
> 
> '71 and '74 Toyota's that my wife owned seemed happy as well.
> My '74 Spit is still going strong...I'm not the original owner but by
> the looks of it that head's been on there a good long while. :-)
> 
> Tom O'Malley <You can trust your car to the man who wears the star...>
> '74, '77 Spits

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>