triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Steve's replies on the "M" word

To: triumphs@Autox.Team.Net
Subject: Steve's replies on the "M" word
From: ybullet@flash.net (Steve L. Toth)
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 21:36:55 -0500
>Steve wrote:
>"  Anyone that compares it to one of our beloved cars has no class.
>Personally, I don't like the car.  It's just a plain and simple copy of a
>Lotus.  It's just another thing that the Japanese copied from another
>country."
>
>Steve,
>   Spoken like a true TR Man.  It's the people new to the sport that don't
>even realize it's a Lotus knock off. Thanks for educating them and glad to
>hear you are back on the road.
>
>Keep this M crap off the list,
>Richard
>71 GT6 MKIII
>Austin, TX


   Thanks for the support Richard.  I realize that (they) are reliable, etc,
yadda, yadda, yadda...

   I did state to all those who I offended that my views were _personal_
opinion.  Besides the fact that that word sounds like a product that you
would use when you aren't feeling quite so fresh, if it was the last
vehicle available for purchase, I would ride a bicycle.  Sorry to those few
again.

   I am a _true_ British Iron owner.  I've been driving or riding Brritish
since
1977 when I had a 1968 Triumph Tiger.

   Also as someone else stated (I don't remember who), why is there ANY
conversation about other cars?  It's a TRIUMPH list, right?

   Okay, I'll give it a rest....for now.


                                                     Steve




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>