>Steve wrote:
>" Anyone that compares it to one of our beloved cars has no class.
>Personally, I don't like the car. It's just a plain and simple copy of a
>Lotus. It's just another thing that the Japanese copied from another
>country."
>
>Steve,
> Spoken like a true TR Man. It's the people new to the sport that don't
>even realize it's a Lotus knock off. Thanks for educating them and glad to
>hear you are back on the road.
>
>Keep this M crap off the list,
>Richard
>71 GT6 MKIII
>Austin, TX
Thanks for the support Richard. I realize that (they) are reliable, etc,
yadda, yadda, yadda...
I did state to all those who I offended that my views were _personal_
opinion. Besides the fact that that word sounds like a product that you
would use when you aren't feeling quite so fresh, if it was the last
vehicle available for purchase, I would ride a bicycle. Sorry to those few
again.
I am a _true_ British Iron owner. I've been driving or riding Brritish
since
1977 when I had a 1968 Triumph Tiger.
Also as someone else stated (I don't remember who), why is there ANY
conversation about other cars? It's a TRIUMPH list, right?
Okay, I'll give it a rest....for now.
Steve
|