To: | "Vincenti, Ross" <Ross.Vincenti@transamerica.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Value of a (real) Lotus 7? <0694433D3A80A028*/c=US/admd=ATTmail/prmd=Transam/o=tfs/s=Vincenti/g=Ross/@MHS> |
From: | Berry Kercheval <kerch@parc.xerox.com> |
Date: | Mon, 21 Jul 1997 16:21:23 PDT |
Cc: | "Triumph List" (Return requested) <triumphs@Autox.Team.Net>, kerch@parc.xerox.com |
>>>"Vincenti, Ross" said: > There is a 1971(?) Lotus 7 for sale ... Not a Caterham copy > (which by themselves are damn nice toys, too) My understanding was that Caterham's are just as "real" as the original Lotus-badged cars, since Caterham bought the license to build them and most of the tooling from Lotus; some of Caterhams workers are even ex-Lotus. OF course, to some collectors a "Lotus" 7 is more desirable than a "Caterham" 7, but I think each has a claim to be "real", and not copies. Now, there are a few other companies that *do* make copies; that's different. --berry Berry Kercheval :: kerch@parc.xerox.com :: Xerox Palo Alto Research Center |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Positive Camber Problem, Nolan Penney |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Warning about mail sent to iName addresses, Christian Simonsen |
Previous by Thread: | TR6 do, Robert J Carley |
Next by Thread: | Copperslip on the list., Barry P. Warwick |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |