triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: general timing question

To: triumphs@Autox.Team.Net
Subject: Re: general timing question
From: Michael Galloway <mgx@icesar.epm.ornl.gov>
Date: Tue, 27 May 1997 15:29:02 -0400
References: <vines.jgv7+6uKWnA@cmoak6.milacron.com> <3389A67A.2FCB@sjm.infi.net>
is this really true? being mechanically challanged, i was under the
impression that the mixture was controlled entirely in the carb.
i know that running the wrong timing can be a bad thing, but i
did not know the timing can affect the mixture.

-- michael galloway
   '78 spitfire

As Said By Brian N. (bwnbcg@sjm.infi.net):
> Sean Johnson wrote:
> 
> Sean-
> 
> The cams were possibly a little different in these engines.  But the
> main reason for the timing difference is that the older engines were
> timed with the vacuum advance disconnnected from the distributor and
> capped.  The later engines had a vacuum RETARD distributor and the
> timing was set with the vacuum ATTACHED.  If you capped the retard, you
> will find the reading close to the 10 BTDC of the advance type.  Be
> careful not to get the timing out of spec on a catalytic converter
> model, or you can run too rich and burn up the cat and the car.  That's
> why they are call Spitfire.
> 
> Brian

-- 
-- m

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>