On Tue, 7 Jan 97 07:03:02 EST R John Lye <rjl6n@uva.pcmail.virginia.edu>
writes:
>On Jan 6, 7:55pm, JoeSimcoe@aol.com wrote:
>> As long as it is the correct weight it is all pretty much just
>> marketing (as far as any difference goes)
>>
>> I can't sight the source, but a recent article went to great lengths
>> to point out this fact.
>
>That would probably be the article in Consumer Reports - the magazine
>for the lowest common denominator...
>
>later,
>
>John Lye
>
>rjl6n@virginia.EDU
>http://avery.med.virginia.edu/~rjl6n/homepage.htm
>
Based on experience- there is value-- ease of starting, decreased wear,
decreased friction?, Should be good for turbos-doesnt coke at higher
temps than mineral oil
Based on lower viscosity @ lo T & higher viscosity @ hi T, with less
breakdown--
should be better for extreme conditions--desert & artic as well as racing
worth the extra cost?
-- your call-- i think so
doc
|