triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Compression Tests--real world

To: Doug Mitchell <dmitchel@ford.com>
Subject: Re: Compression Tests--real world
From: ngaard@utxvms.cc.utexas.edu
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 11:09:05 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: SCHWANGAU@aol.com, KVacek@aol.com, captainzoso@juno.com, triumphs@autox.team.net
Does that mean I shouldn't be excited about having 200-210 across the 
board in my TR6 engine in my GT6? And that is when it is warm...

Well, at long as it runs great...

Michael
2 GT6's and 1 TR6 - all keeping me poor

On Mon, 14 Oct 1996, Doug Mitchell wrote:

> On Oct 14,  9:28am, SCHWANGAU@aol.com wrote:
> > Subject: Re: Compression Tests--real world
> > Why don't the numbers work for my application?  I am measuring 180 psi on a
> > 9.6 to 1 motor, and a 150 on a 7.5 to one motor.  There must be some other
> > factor we are not considering.  Inertia? Chamber shape?  Latitude? Left
> > Coast?
> >
> > Brian N.
> >
> > 65 Spitfire 9.6 cr
> > 79 Spitfire 7.5 cr
> > (California)
> >
> >-- End of excerpt from SCHWANGAU@aol.com
> 
> 
> Brian and others,
> 
> I just talked to a friend of mine who works in engines, and he tells me
> that you *cannot* calculate the compression ratio from the measured
> compression. He further states that you *cannot* accurately predict
> compression from the known (or idealized) compression ratio.
> 
> One of the variables affecting the compression is valve timing. As the
> intake valve opens later and later, compression will drop.
> 
> Doug Mitchell
> dmitchel@ford.com
> dmitchel@ismi.net
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>