triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: TR6 Vacumn Advance etc.

To: "Riggs, R. (Kevin)" <rkriggs@hsv28.pcmail.ingr.com>
Subject: RE: TR6 Vacumn Advance etc.
From: paisley@boulder.nist.gov (Scott W. Paisley)
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 1995 09:28:58 -0600
Cc: "'Randy Smith'" <rsmith@jog.syr.servtech.com>, TR Mailing List <triumphs@autox.team.net>
References: <2FE9777D@hubsmp9.pcmail.ingr.com>
R. Riggs writes:

 > Are you *certain* it's a vacuum advance?  On my '72, I only have vacuum 
 > retard.  Several people have offered the advice that you're better off 
 > (performance-wise) disabling the vacuum retard can anyway.  It retards the 
 > timing at idle to give cleaner emissions, but this reduces performance 
 > pretty significantly.

It's probably just a single retard unit.  But why would a vacuum
retard reduce performance?  When I stomp on the gas, there's very
little vacuum left, and the advance on the distributer would be
advancing with engine rpm.  I'm tring to think how a vacuum retard
would hurt performance.  I guess from a dead stop it wouldn't be so
great, but hey, just advance the entire distributor!  Anyone got any
insight on this?

-Scotty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>