Cullen,
Only issue I do see is that the add claims the car is a 1966 when the body has
the metal cover for the soft top. Of course the car could have been originally
sold as a 1966 when in fact it was built in 1965 or earlier.
Dan
---- deiland1@elp.rr.com wrote:
> Cullen,
>
> Add clearly states it is a Tiger Clone. Seems to be advertised as it should
> be by stating it is a clone and not the real deal. I see no issue since the
> seller has clearly stated it is a clone.
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
> ---- Cullen McCann <cmccann1972@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have gotten in trouble for claiming that I know a real Tiger or an Alger
> > when I see one, as stated a few days ago, thats what the TAC process is
> > for, and I support that.
> >
> > But this one is one to be nervous about. Granted he isnt really claiming
> > that in his ad. But its got the wing scripts and quarter badges that could
> > mislead a new buyer if they didnt know what they were looking for.
> >
> > http://columbus.craigslist.org/cto/4239742848.html
> >
> > Cullen
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > tigers@autox.team.net
> >
> > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> > Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> > Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> > Unsubscribe:
> > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/deiland1@elp.rr.com
> _______________________________________________
>
> tigers@autox.team.net
>
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/deiland1@elp.rr.com
_______________________________________________
tigers@autox.team.net
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mharc@autox.team.net
|